Active Not RecruitingNot applicableNCT05491213
Official study title

TELESCOPE- TELEhealth Shared Decision-making COaching

Study summary

Hypothesis 1a: The investigators anticipate that navigator decision coaching, compared to enhanced usual care (EUC) will result in higher quality SDM for lung cancer screening (LCS )(primary outcome), greater knowledge of lung cancer screening benefits and harms, and lower decisional conflict. Hypothesis 1b: Compared to enhanced usual care (EUC), we expect that TELESCOPE will result in more screening discussions, increased initial for lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose CT scan (LDCT) uptake among interested participants, increased adherence to repeat LCS and diagnostic testing, and increased smoking cessation referrals for current smokers. Hypothesis 2: The investigators expect that a "booster" coaching session will increase adherence to repeat lung cancer screening (LCS).

Ask AI to explain this study
Start here

Key things to know

Main goalScreening

This describes the study’s primary purpose.

What is being studiedTELESCOPE, Remote Decision Coaching with Navigation Intervention

The study team can explain what participation involves.

Who it may be forLung Neoplasms

These are broad labels—not an eligibility decision.

Checked against the public recordLast updated Oct 14, 2026 · Source: ClinicalTrials.gov

Is enrollment open?Active Not Recruiting

The study is underway but is not accepting new participants.

What kind of study?Not applicable

Interventional

Where is it offered?2 U.S. locations

Locations may change over time.

Who runs it?Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Study sponsor

01
Study overview

What this study is about

Purpose
Screening
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Sponsor
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Interventions being studied
Behavioral: TELESCOPE, Remote Decision Coaching with Navigation Intervention
02
Explore related studies

How this study is categorized

These labels come from structured fields and exact terms in the public record.

03
Public criteria

Who may be able to participate

The sponsor separates these requirements into two groups. You do not need to interpret them alone—use them to guide a conversation with the study team.

Requirements people may need to meetInclusion criteria
  • \- Inclusion Criteria Cluster Randomized Trial Eligibility of patients for the cluster randomized trial will follow United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria for lung cancer screening. Specifically, patients must:
  • Be 50 to 77 years of age
  • Be a current or former smoker having quit within the past 15 years
  • Have at least a 20 pack-year smoking history
  • Be scheduled for a non-acute care visit at one of the study sites. Interviews (N=50) Participants completing the semi-structured interviews will be:
  • A practicing primary care clinician or a clinic director (n=20), nursing director, or clinic practice administrator (n=20) at one of the participating sites or a TELESCOPE study patient navigator (n=7) and nurse navigator (n = 3)
  • Age 18 or older
  • Fluent in English Online surveys (N=130) Providers completing online PRISM construct surveys will be:
  • A practicing primary care provider at one of the participating sites or a TELESCOPE study navigator
  • Age 18 or older
  • Fluent in English
Reasons someone may not be able to joinExclusion criteria
  • \- Cluster Randomized Trial Excluded will be patients who:
  • Do not speak English
  • Have a history lung cancer
  • Were screened for lung cancer within the past 12 months
  • Have health conditions that make them poor candidates for curative treatment as determined by the primary care provider
  • Are unable to provide informed consent Interviews (N=50) Providers/administrators will be excluded if they:
  • Are unable to provide informed consent Online surveys (N=130)
  • Are unable to provide informed consent
  • Women who are pregnant. English proficiency is required for the completion of surveys, and the intervention will be conducted in English.

Important: This is the sponsor’s public criteria, not a determination of eligibility. The study team must review your individual situation.

04
Study sites

U.S. locations

  • Rutgers Cancer InstituteNew Brunswick, New Jersey
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHouston, Texas

Source and freshness
Processed from ClinicalTrials.gov. Last public update: Oct 14, 2026. Always confirm current availability with the study team.

View original record ↗